How Two Lawmakers Overruled Everybody to Get a Stadium Approved

August 26, 2016

Inside Insight

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
By PHILLIP CEASE

American Football on Field

Leatherman and White get it done

The term “legislative state” gets thrown around a lot by people trying to describe the power structure for South Carolina’s government. It’s supposed to make the state’s gross imbalance of power seem like a reasonable alternative – a “legislative state,” as opposed to an “executive state,” sounds like a legitimate thing.

Another problem with the term, however, is that it implies the entire legislature runs the state. In fact, a better argument can be made that a small group of legislative leaders run it. Consider the recent controversy over the expansion of Coastal Carolina’s stadium.

First, some context. Coastal Carolina University decided to move from the Big South to the Sun Belt Conference. In order to make this switch, university officials needed to increase the size of the school’s stadium and wanted to issue bonds to cover the construction cost.

Sen. Hugh Leatherman

Sen. Hugh Leatherman

The Commission on Higher Education (CHE) first had to approve the bond request, but the agency denied it – four times – citing insufficient funding to cover the bond debt and a board member’s own experience with the unforeseen costs of switching conferences. Normally that would be the end of the story. But thanks to that small group of powerful legislators in Columbia, Coastal Carolina will get its stadium expansion.

At the very end of the budget process, legislators slipped in two provisos (laws that expire at the end of the fiscal year) that allowed Coastal Carolina to circumvent the CHE’s decision. The provisos were sponsored by Ways and Means Chairman Brian White (R-Anderson). In the Conference Committee for the budget, Senate Finance chairman Hugh Leatherman (R-Florence) agreed to the House provisos. They were included in the final budget.

(Why Leatherman and White went out of their way to assist Coastal Carolina in this way is unclear – the school is not located in either lawmaker’s district. It’s worth noting that CCU has spent $15,000 on lobbying in 2016.)

Gov. Nikki Haley vetoed the provisos, noting in her veto message that Coastal Carolina “deployed an aggressive lobbying effort to bypass CHE’s statutory responsibility to review and consider higher education capital projects, resulting in this proviso.” She went on: “The project, primarily funded by tuition-backed debt, nearly doubled in cost since its original proposal last fall.”

The governor’s vetoes were overwhelmingly overridden in the House. In the Senate, one proviso was sustained – meaning the Senate agreed with the governor’s veto. But ten minutes later, Senate leaders, evidently unhappy with the result, moved to reconsider – a parliamentary maneuver allowing the chamber to take up a veto again even though members already sustained it. Both White and Leatherman voted to override the vetoes in their respective chambers.

Rep. Brian White

Rep. Brian White

The next step for Coastal Carolina was to go before the Joint Bond Review Committee (JBRC), a body made up entirely of legislators. The chairman and vice chairman of the JBRC are none other than Sen. Leatherman and Rep. White, respectively. The committee approved the bond proposal.

After it was approved by the JBRC, the State Fiscal Accountability Authority (SFAA) voted this week 3 to 2 to allow the project to move forward. Leatherman and White are on that five-member board, too; they accounted for two of the three “aye” votes.

In the end, White and Leatherman voted on the proposal no fewer than seven times. Four for White and three for Leatherman – and this doesn’t include White’s own amendment that introduced the two provisos.

The governor, meanwhile – who, unlike White and Leatherman, is elected by the entire state, not merely by a single legislative district – only got to act on the measure twice: first with a veto, second with a vote on the SFAA. In both cases, she was outgunned by two legislative leaders.

Maybe the best term isn’t “legislative state” after all. Maybe we should refer to South Carolina an “oligarchic state.”

Consider Leatherman. The Florence lawmaker has at least 46 boards and commission seats he either serves on or can appoint to. On some boards he appoints more than one member – for example the powerful Judicial Merit Selection Committee, which nominates judicial candidates to the legislature for election.

A few years ago when the legislature passed and the governor signed a government restructuring bill that supposedly “abolished” the Budget and Control Board, lawmakers and other politicos cheered the “historic” victory for accountability. Judging by the CCU stadium controversy, however, the end results of the new restructuring law were (a) that the Budget and Control Board has a new name – it’s the SFAA now – and (b) that the oligarchy remains firmly in place.

But if you’re a small university wanting to fund a stadium expansion, an oligarchy is just what you may need.

Phillip Cease is director of research at the South Carolina Policy Council

  • JimmyB

    Richard Eckstrom voted with Leatherman and White to give them a majority agains Governor Haley and Treasurer Loftis.

    • ELCID

      Eckstrom is also on Pascoe list of thieves to be punished.
      He’s a jailbird walking, only a few more weeks of freedom for him too.

  • cnb

    Let me see if I understand this:
    > Jim Clyburn got $21.5m for beautification and pet projects.
    >Brian Anderson & Hugh Leatherman got $32m for an expansion to Coastal Carolina’s foot ball stadium.
    > And now I read that road funding is going to fall short next year and Brian Anderson said the House will analyze cost a little more. Really Brian? How about that Football Stadium?

    I am guessing with all this extra money we have or don’t have there will be no need for tax increases to repair roads?

    And the band played on.

  • Prosecute the Pigs

    Use the Sherman Act and Rico Act to take these two pigs out of society. File federal suits in civil court against them first, bring up these acts.

  • ELCID

    Don’t fret, both are on the Pascoe hit list.
    These two crooks will end up spending the rest of their lives in Jail: where they so justly belong.

    • cnb

      I hope you are correct.

  • Myrtle Beach

    What do they all have in common. Mark Kelly and the Myrtle Beach Area Cham

  • Pingback: What Makes One Lawmaker So Powerful? | The South Carolina Policy Council()

  • Pingback: best restaurants in atlanta ga()

  • Pingback: goods()

  • Pingback: Why USC’s Budget Proviso Is Unconstitutional | The South Carolina Policy Council()

  • Pingback: pax 3 airport()

  • Pingback: GVK BIO()

  • Pingback: Who Controls S.C. State Government | The South Carolina Policy Council()

  • Pingback: roofer()