DOT funds flow to roads alliance

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

steam roller road

Some seeking tax hike get hundreds of millions

Since 2014, at least eight members of a nonprofit pushing for an increase in the state’s gas tax collectively have received more than $451 million from the state Department of Transportation, records show.

The money was paid to contractors who are members of the South Carolina Alliance to Fix Our Roads (SCFOR), in fiscal years 2015 and 2016, according to a review of comptroller general records:

  • Sloan Construction Co. — $78.35 million
  • Palmetto Paving Corp. — $77.71 million
  • C.R. Jackson –$75.14 million
  • The Lane Construction Corp. — $61.67 million
  • Zachry Construction — $57.9 million
  • Banks Construction Co. — $37 million
  • Ashmore Brothers — $35.9 million
  • Sanders Brothers Construction — $22 million
  • Granite Contracting — $11.6 million

The payments are nearly a quarter of all expenditures, approximately $2 billion, during that time by DOT, including to utilities, counties, and other government entities.

(In fiscal year 2015, Palmetto Paving was the fifth-highest-paid vendor across all state agencies. In fiscal year 2016, Sloan Construction was the sixth-highest paid vendor across all South Carolina agencies, followed in seventh place by Palmetto Paving.)

Some of the same contractors figured prominently as big-dollar DOT vendors and roads alliance members in a 2015 review of records conducted by The Nerve, when the alliance was also pushing for a gas-tax increase.

Reid Banks, president and CEO of Banks Construction, a Charleston-based company that specializes in paving and grading, is also a member of the legislatively controlled Joint Transportation Review Committee, which nominates candidates to the DOT Commission. The commission approves contracts for large road projects. Banks formerly served on the SCFOR board of directors, a status conveyed by a level of paid dues.

SCFOR, along with an ad hoc “Road Coalition,” have been in the news lately as they’ve pushed the state House to pass a road funding bill that would raise the state fuels tax by 10 cents over the next five years. An estimated $600 million derived from the tax increase would be spent by DOT on road construction. The bill could be up for a vote in the House this week. (Update: It passed the House on a 97-18 vote Wednesday).

When the Road Coalition held a press conference at the Statehouse last week, it put other alliance members front and center, such as Rick Todd, president and CEO of the South Carolina Trucking Association, and Ronnie Summers of the Palmetto Agribusiness Council, as well as Michelin North America President Pete Selleck, all of whom benefit less directly from roads spending.

The Road Coalition, which has no dues or membership or positions, periodically assembles to press for more spending on roads.

SCFOR, a 501(c)(4) nonprofit, which was begun in 1981 under another name, works steadily on the issue. It’s been broadening its membership since 2012, says vice president and registered lobbyist Jordan Marsh.

SCFOR still has many of the biggest road firms, but, Marsh told The Nerve, “It’s not just a bunch of contractors sitting around a room trying to decide what we’re going to push for.”

Will there always be an SCFOR? How much funding would be enough for its members?

“The goal would be to pass significant legislation, with dedicated funding, that would basically work ourselves out of a job,” Marsh said.

Nerve stories are always free to reprint and repost. We only ask that you credit The Nerve.



  • MouseTalk

    Dear Senator; We
    seem to have a “Good-Ol-Boy” political system in the state of South Carolina!
    This atmosphere is damning to the citizens of this state and financially lucrative
    to some lifelong politicians.

    Legislators have
    what I call a Club for Power and Wealth and the people of our State know this
    fact. I believe many politicians have been elected and sent to Columbia with
    great intentions but soon realize that in order to survive and attain their
    goals, they have to join the “Club”. As a member they are very careful not to
    point out questionable behavior of other Club members for to do so would cause
    them to be ostracized.

    My concern at this
    time seems to be the deteriorating highway infrastructure and the inability of
    the legislature to address the issue, without calling for a gas tax
    increase. Hugh Leatherman and Mike
    Wooten are two “Club” members that are knee deep in lining their pockets with
    DOT money. A conflict of interest is so obvious that a call for higher gas
    taxes stinks to high heaven. The I-73 construction project is a perfect example
    of cronyism. Both of these men mentioned above have a vested interest in
    spending DOT money on new road construction when we really need ROAD

    Please resist
    raising our taxes because many, like myself, are on fixed incomes and higher
    gas taxes will hurt those who are already financially in the toilet!

    Any increase in
    gasoline taxes, even with a offset reduction in State income taxes will hurt
    the poor and retirement community. You have not thought this through well
    enough and if you advocate an increase in gas taxes then I would say you are in
    denial of the wishes of the people!

  • TrikkiNikki

    Maybe instead of just contractors, you guys should look into the top-earning consultants/civil engineering firms doing work for SCDOT… ICE, HDR/ICA, and several other firms have been receiving many of the big money contracts here lately

  • Criminal SC Government

    Organized Crime

  • Pingback: Statehouse Update: Gas Tax Hike in the Senate | The South Carolina Policy Council()

  • Pingback: spinner()

  • Pingback: Peruvian alpaca clothing the best alpaca shop of peruvian clothing()

  • Pingback: Dungeon()

  • Pingback: How the DOT Commission Plans to Spend New Gas Tax Revenue | The South Carolina Policy Council()

  • Pingback: 77 Nomor()